Dear Editor, A move that is sparking debate, the proposed Constitution Amendment (No. 32) Bill, which seeks to introduce proxy voting within its Parliament is a step back in parliamentary responsibility.

This change would allow Members of Parliament (MPs) to cast votes on behalf of absent MPs. While the intention is to ensure that the legislative process is not hindered by the absence of MPs, this proposal does not align with the best practices of a robust democratic system.

Being an MP is a full-time commitment. MPs are elected to represent the people of their constituencies, and part of that role involves being physically present in Parliament to debate, scrutinise, and vote on important matters. It is a responsibility that carries the weight of the public’s trust and should not be taken lightly.

The premise of proxy voting suggests that physical attendance is not a critical component of an MP’s job. However, the presence of MPs during parliamentary sessions is a cornerstone of democratic accountability. It ensures that elected representatives are actively participating in the legislative process, engaging in discussions, and being available to respond to the changing dynamics of debate — elements that are vital for informed decision-making.

Furthermore, the proxy voting system could potentially open the door to manipulation and reduce the incentives for MPs to attend parliamentary sessions. It undermines the principle of personal responsibility and dilutes the direct link between the constituents and their representatives. The presence of MPs is also essential for the richness of parliamentary debates, fostering a diverse array of opinions and perspectives that are necessary for a healthy democracy.

In our small nation, every MP’s involvement is significant, and the proposed proxy voting system may undervalue this importance. The Cook Islands prides itself on a close-knit community where leaders are expected to be accessible and directly accountable to the people they serve. Implementing a system that enables MPs to be absent from this crucial aspect of their role may not resonate well with the expectations of the electorate. It is crucial to ensure that every elected MP is present to fulfil their obligations to the fullest, maintaining the trust and confidence of our people.

Sammy Mataroa