7 December 2024
9 December 2024
10 December 2024
10 December 2024
6 December 2024
14 November 2024
16 November 2024
19 November 2024
6 November 2024
23 October 2024
21 October 2024
24 September 2024
8 October 2024
5 October 2024
25 September 2024
23 September 2024
21 September 2024
7 September 2024
7 September 2024
3 August 2024
2 September 2024
31 August 2024
23 August 2024
22 August 2024
17 January 2023
13 August 2024
10 August 2024
27 July 2024
3 August 2024
8 July 2024
Wednesday 1 April 2009 | Published in Letters to the Editor
Dear Editor,
There is nothing confusing about my letter of Saturday March 28 in which I challenged all parties meaning the Evans, the Chittys, the Steadmans, the Wraggs and whoever else wants to join the debate (as they put it) to appropriate the answer ie the truth to man’s origin.
Read my letter properly and then consider your ‘position’. For as far as I am concerned man can print all he wants about his origin and still get it wrong - period.
Therefore, I would have thought Mr Chitty is the only qualified one to appropriate the truth. End of story – it’s a no-brainer.
For the truth lies in the PURPOSE of creating man or creating a product.
If you are manufacturer, you cannot create a product without first knowing its intent or reason for creating it. Secondly, how can you create a product and then say it’s an accident?
Keith Koekoe
O’oa