Dear Editor, Constitution Amendment (No. 31) Bill proposes to allow the newly elected Parliament to begin its work promptly after a general election, without the need to wait for the resolution of election petitions.

This might seem like a way to expedite governance, but it raises an important question: Is it prudent to overlook the due process of resolving election disputes?

Election petitions are formal complaints that challenge the validity of election results. They serve as a critical check and balance in the democratic process, ensuring that every vote is fairly counted and that the election outcomes truly reflect the will of the people. Disregarding these petitions until after the new Parliament is in session could potentially undermine public trust in the electoral process and the legitimacy of the government itself.

Consider a sports tournament where a match’s outcome is disputed. It would be unfair to declare a winner and proceed to the next round before addressing the concerns raised about the match’s fairness. Similarly, it is essential for the Cook Islands’ democracy to ensure that any disputes are settled before the newly elected representatives assume their official duties. This not only fortifies the democratic process but also reinforces the public’s confidence in their elected officials.

The Cook Islands government needs to value transparency and fairness in its electoral process. Any rush to commence parliamentary business without resolving election petitions might save time in the short run, but the long-term costs to democratic integrity could be substantial. Our people deserve to know that their representatives have been elected through a process that is beyond reproach.

It is essential to recognise that while efficiency in government operations is important, it should not come at the expense of due process and electoral integrity. As such, the Constitution Amendment (No. 31) Bill requires further scrutiny and debate to ensure that it aligns with the Cook Islands’ commitment to democracy and justice.

The proposed amendment to allow a newly elected Parliament to commence its work without awaiting the outcome of election petitions is not in the best interest of the Cook Islands. Upholding the sanctity of the electoral process is crucial for maintaining the health and vibrancy of any democracy. As the Cook Islands Parliament considers this amendment, it is vital to balance the desire for swift government action with the necessity of due diligence in the democratic process.

Sammy Mataroa.