Could Fiji regime leader Frank Bainimarama be tripped up by his own complicated decrees? Has he flouted rules and jeopardised his own likelihood of election to legitimate power?

An observer of Fiji politics says Prime Minister Frank Bainimarama’s proposed and still-yet-to-be-officially-registered political party is being snared by its own rules and it may have trouble justifying why it has apparently ignored them.

The Fiji Elections Office has confirmed it has received six objections to the registration of Rear Admiral Bainimarama’s proposed Fiji First Party.

The party has 20 days to respond to the objections.

Auckland University’s Dr Steven Ratuva says Fiji First is facing some serious allegations.

And he says, underlying it all, is the fact that the regime’s electoral and political parties decrees are proving unworkable.

“I’m not really sure what’s going to happen, but the Elections Office has asked Fiji First to clarify some of those allegations and objections raised in relation to its registration.

“So, they’re going to go through very challenging times in terms of having to respond.

“Some of the allegations are quite serious – such as the use of the state logo as a party symbol.

“So they have 20 days to respond to these before they’re eligible to registration and what will come out of it is, at this point in time, not very clear.

He says it appears at this stage it does seem that the Elections Office is taking the claims seriously and they are treating Fiji First no differently to any other party.

“Yeah, we have two authorities involved in this. One is the police, which has been investigating some of the allegations that Fiji First is in breach of the electoral decree and secondly is the Electoral Office itself, which has received the objections to the registration of the Fiji First party.

“So Fiji First officials will have to respond to two sets of allegations – from the police on one hand and the Electoral Office on the other.

Ratuva ws asked how likely is it that Fiji First will be able to provide an adequate enough response, given that the rules are quite strict.

“Well, that’s one of the ironies of the situation, because they’re the ones that created those rules in hoping that it might regulate the behaviour of the various political parties.

“But little did they realise that they were going to be caught in that themselves.

“Most of the parties have been registered and went through it quite smoothly, but now they, Fiji First, are the ones caught up in that and so they’ll have to look for some magical means by which they can get out of it.

“For instance, they’ll have to justify why they’re using the government coat of arms and secondly, they should be able to draw the line between prime minister and the ministers going out to talk to the public about what they’re doing – and political campaigning.

“I mean, it’s a very grey area and they will have to justify and draw the line somewhere.

“So I think the political parties which have put forward their objections are probably hoping that Fiji First gets into real trouble which means it will give them a real chance of winning the election.

He agrees that the current situation has revealed the inadequacy with the two decrees surrounding the election and has shown, in fact, that they are unworkable.

“I suppose by putting those restrictions, not only did it undermine the re-democratisation agenda, it was also going to restrict the way in which the people themselves are going to engage in the political debate.

“So while the various political parties managed to wriggle their way out of their various legal tight corners – Fiji First itself, which has been in power and they’re the ones which created the decrees – are probably realising now that they made a mistake.

“And they’re probably telling themselves, ‘why did we do this in the first place?’ – because now they have to be subjected to the rules which they themselves created.”

He was asked if it was likely that because Fiji First – being the controlling regime’s party – could be afforded some kind of favourable treatment.

“That’s probably part of the subtle psychology in there.

“They’re hoping that as the party in power, as the ones who instigated the coup, as the dominant political force – they probably thought that the rules were not going to apply to them.

“They were hoping it was going to be preferentially applied to them rather than, in a serious way, entrap them. So they’re probably hoping that they will get away with this.”